Construction Economics Research Paper Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1500 words

Construction Economics - Research Paper Example Strategy of Barratt is to acquire land for establishing houses such as standalone and more for greater sustainability in the market (Barratt Developments PLC, 2015). In this context, the paper intends to plan for the next two years where the company needs to analyse the situation best suited. The paper will analyse whether Barratt should construct smaller houses or rely on the land bank for the future two years. Success of business depends on various aspects such as the macro and micro scenario the company is operating in. With regard to the housing industry, it can be stated that the success and efficient decision making with regard to the performance of business depends on several aspects. Building of houses depends on the potential of the market and the capabilities of the company. It is witnessed that Barratt is a large house builder having high potential in the market, as it understands the market requirements. Micro factors that lead to the success of the housing builders are the location, plans, orientation as well as building layout and size. On the other hand, the macro factors affecting the industry include the government policies, financing, labour cost and market potential. The conditions of the UK market have been identified to be unstable to a certain extent due to the rise in prices and potential political uncertainty (KnightFrank, 2015; Bunn & Rostom, 2014). Housing prices d epend on factors such as economic growth, rate of interest, employment, consumer confidence and important aspect of supply and demand. Construction of large houses depends on various facets of the economy. With regard to Barratt, if the company decides to construct new large buildings, then the opportunity cost will be considerably high. The reason being for the construction of the large building, that company has to increase their land bank and need more financial aids. Furthermore, as per the market situation, it is

Does income inequality hurt economic growth Term Paper

Does income inequality hurt economic growth - Term Paper Example The essay further applies the Lorenz Curves model in investigating income distribution in Nigeria and KSA. A deep Lorenz curve implies high level of income inequality in a country. That is the case of Nigeria and KSA. Over the past generations, concern about rising or high-income inequality curtailed primarily from a credence that it is one-sided. In the contemporary world, however, the sources of concern have shifted. The leading concern now is whether income inequality can hurt economic growth. Similarly, income inequality can also have harmful effects on the outcomes people value, such as education, health, happiness, democracy and many other elements that have direct impacts on economic growth. Current studies indicate that income inequality does not only affect people at the bottom but also affects the nation as a whole. The studies explain that the growing income inequality may be the reason that inhibits economies from recovering from the excessive recession. As per a report by OECD, inequality slackens GDP growth through hindering the accumulation of human capital. This trend hurts long-term economic prospects, as well as educational outcomes for persons on the lesser section of a nation’s income ladder. In its recommendation, the report suggests a check-up against this propensity by capitalizing in education and health (OECD, 2015, p. 1). It also calls for a more direct method of assistance to help reduce inequality without hurting economic growth. Furthermore, OECD established that direct cash transfers may not slow down the growth of GDP when these policies are smartly designed, as well as implemented. Depiction based on harmonised data that cover the OECD nations over the past three decades, the econometric analysis submits that income inequality possesses a negative, as well as statistically significant influence on succeeding growth. In specific, the greatest issue is the breach between small income households and the better

History of the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI)

History of the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) Tray Matthews Fidelity, Bravery and Integrity â€Å"Fidelity, Bravery and Integrity,† that’s the motto of the United State Federal Bureau of Investigation. The FBI was created under the belief of President Theodore Roosevelt and Attorney General Bonaparte claim that â€Å"efficiency and expertise, not political connections, should determine who would best serve the government.† The formation of the FBI is one of the most remarkable things that have transpired through America’s government history. Progressing from the Progressive Era through the Early Years, the New Deal, and both World Wars, Vietnam War, the Watergate Scandal, the Cold War and the transition of FBI Directors to present day. During the 1900’s, our nations constitution was based on the idea of a national government having authority pertaining to issues over the boarders like foreign affairs. So when the Federal Bureau of Investigation was set into place in 1908, the American people were extremely confused. In the past, they were dependent on local cities and counties to fulfill the government responsibly related to them. Now, they have to change their dependency and learn to trust the duty of a new government agency, the Federal Bureau of Investigation. At the beginning of the 1900’s, the Progressive Era was emerging in the United States and lasted around eighteen years. This Era was the starting point of the idea that government intervention was the key to justice in society. Attorney General Bonaparte shared the conjoint Progressive Philosophy beliefs of himself and President Roosevelt to the Department of Justice. They wanted to create a division that would take the Secret Service Detail completely out of the equation. Mostly due to the fact that the Secret Service was going around Attorney General Bonaparte’s back and reporting to they’re own commander. With Bonaparte acting as Attorney General, this act of disobedience frustrated him to the point of passing a law on May 27, 1908, which prevented any Secret Service agents to be involved in or called upon by the Department of Justice to assist in any investigations. Following this law, Attorney General Bonaparte appointed ten former service members and almost a year later, added 34 additional forces to create a new Division to government services. A year after this law was set into place, Attorney General Bonaparte completed his term and set the standard that the ‘chosen 34’ were a permanent addition to the Justice Department. During the early days of the Bureau of Investigation, they dealt with very little crimes. They mostly focused on cases dealing with banking or bankruptcy, fraud or naturalization. When the Bureau of Investigation was first formed, three hundred special agents and three hundred supportive employees were the only people backing it. Two years after the formation of this group, they passed a law, the Mann, prohibiting the transportation of women over state lines for illegal reasons. To keep this illegal transportation from happening, most agents are posted around the boarder of Mexico. When Woodrow Wilson came to power in April 1917, he increased the workload of special agents expanding their caseload to involve espionage and Sabotage Acts. As things in the new unit progressed, they began making great strides to make a name for themselves. By the end of the decade, they had established training posts for incoming/newborn agents, set annual field office inspections, and created the Nation al Division of Identification. January of 1928, Edgar Hoover took over power as the Director of the Bureau of Investigation and changed it for the better. Since Hoover took over power, the Division has grown to six- hundred and fifty employees with four- hundred and forty-one supporting special agents. Division headquarters started popping up all over the United States: New York, Chicago, Baltimore, San Francisco, San Antonio, Atlanta and Cincinnati. Along with the positive changes, there were some negative aspects. He had to let go of some of the agents if they were not properly qualified; he needed to professionalize the organization. While multiple agents did not understand their release, they were aware of the recently added requirements and knew if they could not make protocol, they could not stay. With Hoover in power, there came many achievements. One of the largest achievements was the merging of the fingerprint cards from the police force along with the Bureau of Investigations existing cards into Washing ton D.C, creating one giant criminal database accessible from either group. Right when the United States began looking upwards, the unthinkable happened. In 1929, the Stock Market crashed and a Great Depression spread all across the states. President Franklin D. Roosevelt knew he needed to do something to make an impact and give hope to the people of American. Roosevelt decreased crime by expanding the federal jurisdiction for the Bureau of Investigation to include the places with a high crime- rate related to the recent shift in income. Due to the positive outcome of the expansion, field offices increased from nine cities to forty-two cities; there were now six- hundred and fifty- four special agents and a huge increase from six- hundred and fifty to one- thousand one- hundred and forty- one new employee supporters. So, after the positive impact the Bureau of Investigations has made, it has to be becoming a crucial part of society, right? They have been responsible for closing multiple important cases: The Lindbergh Kidnapping, John Dillinger, Al Capone, and Bonnie and Clyde. Due to the results of these cases, the agency is now looked at as a premiere law enforcement division. In 1932, when they solved the kidnapping of Lindbergh’s baby, the result caused Congress to pass the Kidnapping Statute. In 1934, with the capturing of Dillinger and crossing of state lines, Congress granted agents with the permit to carry a gun and certified them to make arrests. Like mentioned before, the Bureau of Investigation was becoming a beneficial feature to the government. July 1, 1932 they were formally renamed the ‘United States Bureau of Investigation;’ however, there was an unnerving confusion between the United States Bureau of Investigation and the Bureau of Prohibition, so Congress had the bright idea to combine both divisions. Thus, the Federal Bureau of Investigation had begun. By 1936, there was a threat to the American democratic lifestyle by the fascist European countries; this was the beginning of World War ll. Throughout the beginning of the war, United States, Great Britain and France remained neutral due to the signing of the Neutrality Acts. As fascism was coming around more and communist threats were arriving, the FBI had to jump into protection mode, as this was a threat to the United States National Security. President Roosevelt authorized the involvement of the FBI in 1936, but the real impact came in 1940 when Congress passed the Smith Act, allowing the FBI to investigate anything attempting to overthrow the government. War broke out and the Federal Bureau of Investigation were put in the spotlight; given the ultimate power. There were many concerns coming along with this war, which caused the FBI to be on high alert with threats like overthrowing attempts, espionage and sabotage. The FBI was thrown in at full force grabbing agents that were trained in intelligence as well as defensive protection from all forty-two field offices. Because the United States played neutral in this war , they were called in for intelligence collection. One of the major enemy tactics in war is sabotage and there was plenty of it. In 1942, Germany attempted to sabotage on American soil. The FBI take down granted more ‘trust points’ from the Americans to the FBI. Needing more help, the Bureau added almost thirteen thousand more employees and four thousand more agents. Although the FBI had been a major asset during the war, they had other pressing matters to take care of presiding to discrimination and segregation taking place around the war. Even though Hitler committed suicide, and German surrendered, Congress knew that with Stalin still breathing, the fear that communism would haunt the other countries. The President directed all authorization regarding any part of the investigations that are a threat to national security to be carried out by the FBI, reported to the FBI, and driven by the FBI. Throughout all the postwar years, the Bureau’s rein expanding. They were know able to conduct background searches and were now given access to the Atomic Energy database. The FBI began to extend and assist inner states and local law enforcements decrease the crime in their towns. With all the expansion and additional jurisdiction given to the FBI, it was no surprise when Congress passed new federal laws: civil rights violations and gambling. Along with the additional laws, the FBI was an influential partner in enabling African American rights: to vote, serve on juries, and equal accommodations in public. After Prohibition , most of the mobs took place locally. The involvement of the FBI in these investigations was not prominent because there were no violations within the jurisdiction the Bureau had. By the end of the 19060’s, there were now six thousand seven- hundred and three special agents and nine thousand three hundred twenty supportive employees. The amount of field offices increased from forty- two to fifty- eight. When President Kennedy was assassinated, no federal law could investigate the murder because it was a local crime, so President Johnson demanded the Bureau proceed with an investigation. Due to the tragedy, Congress passed a bill proclaiming that any assassination of a government official was an automatic federal crime and to be dealt with as a federal crime. Congress never decelerated guidelines or protocols for the FBI when conducting national security investigations. FBI Director Edgar Hoover died on May 2, 1972. His successor, appointed by President Nixon, was Patrick Gray. Gray’s first act in office was appointing the first women since the 1920’s as a special agent. A couple months after Gray steps into office, there is a break- in at the Democratic National Headquarters; the FBI was called to assistance quickly, but little did they know their own Director had something to do with it. He immediately removed himself from consideration of being a Director and another was soon appointed, William Ruckelshaus. However, a month later Clarence Kelley, twenty-one year FBI agent, was appointed. After the disaster at the Democratic National Headquarters, Director Kelley’s first act was to regain the trust of the American people in the Federal Bureau and law enforcement in general. He created policy’s that targets the training, the selection of members for both law enforcement and the Bureau, collection of investigation material procedures and prioritizing the criminal database. Another contribution Kelley made was in 1974, he established the Career Review Boards to train and identify potential leaders. Since the Watergate fiasco, the media and Congress have been hounding Kelley trying to figure out if there was a glitch in the self- proclaimed intelligence collection process. On March 10, 1976 the counterintelligence guidelines for FBI foreign investigations went into effect. Created by Attorney General Edward Levi, Congresses suspicion slowly dwindled. â€Å"Quality over Quantity† was the name of Kelley’s new management concept. Each field office priority was directed to the types of cases most that express more concern to a certain territory. Through this new concept, three national priorities were established: organized crime, foreign counterintelligence, and white- collar crime. Due to ex- Director Gray’s stance and hiring women, Director Kelley made more of an effort to higher more women to show diversity and ethnic compassion to the public. By the end of the 1970’s, there were nearly eight thousand special agents, eleven thousand support employees and fifty- nine field offices. At the end of the 1970’s, two interesting things took place. The first, Director Kelley, the most beneficial, improving and innovative Director in the FBI so far resigned. Second, the FBI added laser technology to the Identification Division to detect latent crime scene fingerprints. Former Judge William H. Webster was appointed after Director Kelley’s resignation. Following Kelley’s priorities, Webster added the creation of the National Center for the Analysis of Violent Crime, while expanding on the priorities already in place. The press nicknamed 1985 â€Å"the year of the spy† because of the ridiculous amount of espionage cases solved during this time. As time goes on, the jurisdiction of the FBI continues to grow, this time it’s growing to the illegal drug trade route. In 1982, the Attorney General gave the FBI jurisdiction over the DEA. Even though the FBI is expanding rapidly, they still must fulfill duties from when they were a little fish i n a small pond. During the 1980’s, the FBI dealt with multiple cases dealing with fraud. By 1981, there was 10 bank failures and progressed to 282 by 1981. Because of the sudden increase in fraud cases, the Financial Institution Reform, Recovery and Enhancement Act were established. In 1984, the Olympics took Los Angeles. The FBI was put on terrorist and street protection aid right away. There efforts were duly noted and the jurisdiction of the FBI was increased again but this time, it expanded to protecting United States Citizens from outside U.S boundaries. With this increase comes great responsibility. The Bureau was granted the right to arrest terrorists, drug traffickers, and other fugitives without consent of the foreign country. In order to keep up with the new authority, the FBI established the Computer Analysis and Response Team to gain evidence from surrounding computers. May 26, 1987 Judge Webster resigned from the FBI to take over the Director spot at the CIA. Under the acting Director Otto, another national priority was created. The drug protection efforts mentioned during Director Kelley’s triumphing rein was expanded to include drug demand reduction programs. Through these drug programs, the FBI went to multiple local schools sharing their experiences and their thoughts on drugs to educate the youth of America. By 1988, the FBI employed nine thousand six- hundred and sixty- three special agents with the support of thirteen thousand six- hundred and fifty- one employees. The world was stunned when the Berlin Wall collapsed in November 1989. Foreign countries were scrambling to regain control of their policies and security. The FBI reacted immediately by sending three hundred agents to investigate. The new Director established a sixth priority: investigation of violent crimes. However, there was a new concept coming, a concept of federal, state and local police force to take on the violent street gangs- Operation Safe Streets. This was also around the time of the identification break through. DNA technology was booming and here was now genetic crime- scene evidence that could make or break the suspects’ future. Along with the increase in technology, the FBI paid more attention to the steadily but rapidly increasing â€Å"white- collar crimes,† number three on the national priorities list. Along with the heightened attention on how to protect national security, the FBI’s main focus is keeping America out of reach to communism. Two events took place during the 1992- 1993 that affected the FBI policies. The first event was August 1992, the FBI responded to a shooting of a fellow officer, Deputy U.S. Marshal William Degan, while participating in the surveillance of fugitive Randall Weaver. During the course of action trying to detain the shooter, Weaver’s wife was caught in the cross fire and shot by an FBI sniper. Almost a year later, FBI agents were proceeding to end a 51 day standoff, in Texas, with religiously armed sects who had previously taken the lives of four officers who were part of the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco and Firearms. Instead of proceeding in the ending of the standoff, the officers watched as the sects burned down a compound with eight civilians, including three children, whom all died in the blaze. This was center stage for the FBI with the public, the question of the people was, â€Å"How will the FBI respond to crisis in the future?† September 1, 1993 Louis J. Freeh was sworn in as the new Director of the FBI. He had set out with a clear purpose already: respond to the crime problems at home and abroad. To the people around him, this sounded like a good idea, until July 4, 1994 came around. On that day, he announced that the Federal Bureau of Investigation is opening a legal attachà © in Moscow, the old throne of Russian Communism. Between the next eight years, the FBI mission expanded to the international nature of crimes. The budget grew by more than $1.30 billion, and kept increasing when the Bureau hired five thousand and twenty- nine more agents accompanied by four thousand more supporters. United States Attorney Robert S. Mueller, lll was sworn in as FBI newest Director. He had a specific duty once in office: upgrade technology infrastructure, address records, and enhance the foreign counterintelligence analysis of the damage done by former special agent Robert Hanssen. Within days of this venture, the most horrendous day the United States has ever seen happened, September 11. The FBI partnered with local law enforcement in urge to figure out the cause of this disaster. October 26, President Bush signed the Patriot Act, which basically add new provisions if a terrorist attack were to happen in order to protect the American people. In order to satisfy the change in mission statements, Director Mueller restructured the operations for the Bureau hoping to prevent any further attacks. It strengthened its support to federal, and international law enforcement and created more complex technological structures that take more to crack. As we take a look back through the years, all we can see if improvement and room for more improvement. The FBI stands today to dedicate itself to ensure it carries out its mission: protect and defend the United States against terrorist and foreign intelligence threats; uphold and enforce criminal laws of the United States and provide leadership and criminal justice services to federal, state and international partners. Resources Brief History of the FBI. FBI. FBI, 21 May 2010. Web. 08 Nov. 2014. Muller, Robert. â€Å"Testimony.† Federal Bureau of Investigation. May 16, 2013. Accessed October 7, 2014. http://www.fbi.gov/news/testimony/fbi-budget-request-for-fiscal-year-2014. Shafritz, Jay M., E.W. Russell, Christopher P. Borick. Introducing Public Administration, Eighth Edition. (Boston: Pearson, 2013) â€Å"Today’s FBI Facts and Figures 2013-2014. â€Å"FBI. March 14, 2013. Accessed October 7, 2014.

Early Modern English Exemplified in Shakespeares Hamlet, Act V Scene 1

Early Modern English Exemplified in Shakespeare's Hamlet, Act V Scene 1 The period of Early Modern English occurred from approximately Fifteen Hundred to some time between Sixteen Fifty and Sixteen Seventy. While this period was characterized mostly by the translation of texts from other languages into English, the language saw its first prominent writer in William Shakespeare contribute works of literary significance to the world. Hamlet Prince of Denmark, in its abbreviated, performed version, was originally included in the quarto of 1603. The current version of the text is based on the 1604-05 version of the text, which is believed to be printed from Shakespeare's own draft (Farnham). Lines 241-280 of Act V scene 1 in Hamlet are an example of Early Modern English as written (and possibly spoken) in the early Seventeenth century; it illustrates aspects of the language such as vocabulary, spelling, syntax and grammar relative to this time period. The dialogue in Hamlet would be recognizable to readers from the Seventeenth century to the present: although Shakespeare's style may differ from the spoken and written dialects of these time periods, his vocabulary is not totally alien. The online version of the Oxford English Dictionary indicates many of the words in this passage had the same or similar meanings when Shakespeare wrote as they do presently. Some examples include madness, "mental disease or insanity"; dangerous, "Fraught with danger or risk; causing or occasioning danger; perilous, hazardous, risky, unsafe"; and whine, "To utter a low somewhat shrill protracted sound or cry, usually expressive of pain or distress." The concept of madness, the adjective dangerous, and the infinitive 'to whine' originate prior to t... ...-279). In the Sixteenth and Seventeenth centuries, while common people were becoming increasingly literate, it was mostly an intellectual demographic that wrote; one certainly would not consider Shakespeare a common user of Early Modern English. However, although Shakespeare did write Hamlet, he intended it to be performed: theatre-goers might have been impressed hearing a more refined and thought-out usage of Early Modern English than what they spoke, but players would have difficulty speaking a language with which they were unfamiliar, just as an audience would have difficulty understanding the performed lines. Therefore, while his writing may be more structured than the general speech of the time, Shakespeare's text can be considered a likely portrayal of the language of his time. Works Cited Hamlet. Edited by Willard Farnham. New York: Penguin Books, 1957.

Rank of Icici Stock Minds

Sheet1 RANK 1 2 3 4 PARTICIPANT NAME COLLEGE NITIN GAJANAN MALUSARE JANARDAN INSTITUTE GIRISH MAHESHKUMAR SAVLANI K S BUSINESS SCHOOL PRATEEK GOVILA BIT MESRA PUNE UNIVERSITY DEPARTMENT OF KISHAN BHATTAD MANAGEMENT SCIENCES (PUMBA) CITY MUMBAI AHMEDABAD RANCHI PUNE PORTFOLIO 1666999. 9 1666553. 6 1666432. 5 1662356. 05 TURNOVER 16935103. 38 19998020 19946293. 4 0 % GAIN 11. 13% 5. 67% 9. 36% 0. 00% Basis highest % change in profit compared to the previous day portfolio COMMENTS REMARKS 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 JIGAR B SHAH SHANTI BUSINESS SCHOOL INDIAN INSTITUTE OF MANAGEMENT SAGAR CHOUDHURY (IIM) ISHAN ONKAR TRIVEDI NIRMA INSTITUTE OF MANAGEMENT ANIL KUMAR YADAV IMS GHAZIABAD RAVINDER REDDY IIT – MADRAS (MGMT DEPT) JAY PRAKASH MEHTA KANDIVALI EDUCATION SOCIETYÂ   INDIAN INSTITIUTE OF PARV DHIMAN MANAGEMENT(IIM) LALA LAJPATRAI INSTITUTE OF DHIRAJ KUNDANMAL SONI MANAGEMENT KALPESH RAJPUT B. K.INSTITUTE OF MANAGEMENT CHETANA'S INSTITUTE OF ROHAN PRAVIN DHUNDUR MANAGEMENT AN D RESEARCH PRIYANKA BHIKHABHAI CHAUDHARY INSTITUTE OF PATEL TECHNOLOGY VISHWAKARMA INSTITUTE OF DINOOP HARIDAS NAIR MANAGEMENT PARLE TILAK VIDYALAYA ASSOCIATION INSTITUTE OF VIJAY DALCHAND SOLANKI MANAGEMENT(PTVAIMS) AHMEDABAD ROHTAK AHMEDABAD DELHI CHENNAI MUMBAI KOLKATA MUMBAI AHMEDABAD MUMBAI GANDHINAGAR PUNE 1633101. 34 1630987. 35 1624240. 56 1607499. 08 1603541. 45 1592069. 45 1587710. 2 1583445. 77 1577859. 05 1571068. 17 1569750 1569228. 22 0877028. 01 19601921. 9 18727524. 25 19529775. 94 13647528. 25 17734802. 6 17597289. 8 13905246. 26 8914119. 7 10081802. 57 880898 18632832. 41 11. 75% Mobile Winner – 14. 03. 13 4. 13% 8. 37% -2. 13% 3. 39% 2. 62% 4. 80% 5. 41% 3. 26% 4. 74% 4. 72% 5. 41% 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 MUMBAI 1568526. 09 1558883. 62 1551591. 65 1551477. 36 1548478. 45 1544469. 5 1542588. 9 1540635. 82 1538577. 6 1536670. 52 1536123. 59 1533144. 14 1531809. 2 9199916 19665170. 27 19578787. 6 9171863. 97 10972784 16540805. 5 3318021. 6955868 . 33 3697253. 9 10295002. 38 18981106. 07 17478175. 1 13408401. 9 5. 97% 2. 78% 2. 33% 3. 31% 1. 95% 2. 96% 3. 11% 3. 28% 4. 15% 2. 62% 1. 97% 1. 98% 2. 12% JAY VITTHALBHAI SANGANI MARVADI INSTITUTE OF MANAGEMENT RAJKOT SOM LALIT INSTITUTE OF KUSHAL AMIT PARIKH AHMEDABAD MANAGEMENT BIJAL BHARATH SELARKA SRM SCHOOL OF MANAGEMENT CHENNAI DHAVAL RAJENDRA DESAI MUMBAI EDUCATIONAL TRUST (MET) MUMBAI PARIN MARU MUMBAI KJ SOMAYA KETAN POPATBHAI S K PATEL INSTITUTE OF DHAMELIYA MANAGEMENT GANDHINAGAR RONAK JAYSUKH SODHA N.L. DALMIYA COLLEGE MUMBAI VISHWA VISHWANI SCHOOL OF PREM KUMAR HYDERABAD BUSINESS PRARTHANA CHANDAR UNITED WORLD SCHOOL OF AMIN BUSINESS MUMBAI SYMBIOSIS COLLEGE OF ARTS & GEORGE PARAPUZHA JOB COMMERCE PUNE LALSINGH SANGRAMSINGH S. B PATIL INSTITUTE OF RAJPUT PUNE MANAGEMENT SUDEEPTA SARMA IILM INSTITUTE FOR HIGHER BORUAH DELHI EDUCATION (IILM ) INSTITUTE OF MANAGEMENT DEVELOPMENT AND RESEARCH (IMDR) AGNEL CHARITIES AGNEL SEVA SANGHA'S FR. C. RODRIGUES INST. OF MANAGEMENT. STUDIES RUSTOMEJEE BUSINESS SCHOOL DAYANANDA SAGAR ACEDEMY OF TECHNOLOGY AND MANAGEMENT MUMBAI INSTITUTE OF MANAGEMENT & RESEARCH GURU NANAK INSTITUTE OF MANAGEMENT STUDIES (GNIMS) INDIAN INSTITUTE OF KNOWLEDGE MANAGEMENT (IIKM) AMITY GLOBAL BUSINESS SCHOOL ACCURATE BUSINESS SCHOOL ATHARVA SCHOOL OF BUSINESS NSTITUTEÂ   OF TECHNOLOGY AND MANAGEMENT- INSTITUTE OF FINANCIAL MARKETS (ITM-IFM) RAWAL INSTITUTE OF ENGINEERING & MANAGEMENT KIRLOSKAR INSTITUTE OF ADVANCED MANAGEMENT STUDIES CITY COLLEGE INDIAN INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY PARUL INSTITUTE OF MANAGEMENT INDIAN INSTITIUT OF MANAGEMENT(IIM) MEENAKSHI SUNDARAJAN SCHOOL OF MGMT JAIPURIA INSTITUTE OF MANAGEMENT STUDIES H. K.INSTITUTE OF MANAGEMENT, STUDIES& RESEARCH, JOGESHWARI CHRIST COLLEGE 30 DIVYA RANI SINGH PUNE 1530024. 8 1504035. 81 1. 22% 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 NIKHITA VINAY RANE BHAUMIK KIRTIKUMAR MEHTA SANTOSH KUMAR ANAND PRAKASH YADAV HARMEET HARBINDER ALAG PRAVEEN GANESAN SASANK BANDARUPALLI MD MOHSIN KHAN SNEHAL SHIVA JI SHINDE MUMBAI MUMBAI BANGALORE MUMBAI MUMBAI CHENNAI HYDERABAD DELHI MUMBAI 1529786. 95 1528691. 21 1526535. 5 1526029. 7 1525450 1523362. 3 1522990. 93 1522771. 22 1522282. 7 1514444. 46 0 948645. 9 1174189. 5 0 19633466. 4 7175048. 23 15763374. 15 11326878. 5 1. 99% 0. 00% 1. 83% 2. 37% 2. 29% 1. 56% 1. 53% 0. 94% 0. 54% 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57SAURAV SHARMA PARVEEN GARG ARPAN KUMAR DAS MADHU SUDAN MC SURENDRA BABU GADWALA DIPAK RASIKBHAI KATHROTIYA SHIVANK GOEL DEVIKA RAJU ASHISH RANA BHAVESH HARISH AGARWAL SASWATA GHOSH RAVIPRAKASH RAMSNEHI PRASAD MILAN A THAKKAR NAVEEN KUMAR BHATNAGAR GOVIND PRATAP SINGH MERTIYA BONY KURIAN PUNNOOSE ANSHUL BANSAL ABHISHEK GOYAL SHAIKH MOHD RAMEEZ MUKHTAR KUSHALAPPA B K JABEZ E DANIEL HARDIC VORA VAISAKH E J MUMBAI DELHI PUNE BANGALORE KANPUR BARODA SHILLONG CHENNAI DELHI MUMBAI BANGALORE 1520505. 07 1517381. 9 1516829. 38 1516420. 05 1516038. 59 1515656. 75 1515339. 65 1515279. 58 1515096. 5 1513370. 8 1513242 15 13070. 33 1512952. 06 1512904. 4 1512802. 4 1512655. 28 1512567. 22 1512270 1635277. 67 2360833. 43 3211287. 58 2450275. 45 2141875. 73 17414304. 45 0 2676943. 84 0 13356288. 94 99393 6559817. 75 18790067. 43 0 0 9150470. 72 17570914 0 1. 77% 0. 97% 1. 12% 1. 09% 1. 15% 0. 57% 0. 34% 0. 95% 1. 94% 0. 64% 0. 76% 0. 91% -8. 71% 2. 66% 1. 22% 1. 67% 1. 03% 2. 11%IIPM AHMEDABAD PUNE AMITY GLOBAL BUSINESS SCHOOL INSTITUTE OF MANAGEMENT STUDIES DEHRADUN (IMS) JK BUSINESS SCHOOL AMITY GLOBAL BUSINESS SCHOOL IIMB MAHARISHI ARVIND INSTITUTE OF SCIENCE AND MANAGEMENT JSPM'S ABACUS INSTITUTE OF COMPUTER SCIENCE AND MANAGEMENT BNMIT BISHOP HEBER COLLEGE IEIBS AKADEMIA REGIONAL INSTITUTE OF COOPERATIVE MANAGEMENT MAHARASHTRA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGIES-SCHOOL OF TELECOM (MIT SOT) GLOBSYN TECHNOLOGIES LTD JAYWANTRAO SAWANT INSTITUTE OF MANAGEMENT RESEARCH SKYLINE BUSINESS SCHOOL CAMP EDUCATION SOCIETY (INSTITUTE OF MANAGEMENT) ATMIYA INSTITUTE OF MANAGEMENT INDIAN INSTITUTE OF PLANNING & MANAGMENT (IIPM, CHATTARPUR) INTERNATIONAL SCHOOL OF MANAGEMENT EXCELLENCE DELHI CHENNAI BANGALORE JAIPUR 58 59 60 61 62 PUNE BANGALORE TRICHY MUMBAI BANGALORE 1512104. 65 1511085 1509935 1509755. 86 1509406. 55 0 0 0 2709639. 3 0 1. 10% 0. 91% 0. 99% 2. 31% 1. 00% 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70CHANCHAL KANSAL SUBHASIS SAHA PUNAM ANNASO BANDAL SONU SINGHAL RAJESH MAHADEV ANDIRAO PARESH ISHVAR BHAI MITHANI SAMRAT THATIKONDA TWARIT S TARPARA PUNE KOLKATA PUNE DELHI PUNE RAJKOT DELHI BANGALORE 1509405. 94 1509016. 5 1508847 1508597. 32 1508523 1507986. 75 1507803. 6 1507612 1000214. 4 0 0 4107663. 24 0 0 2278392. 99 119175 1. 35% 1. 33% 0. 71% 0. 57% 1. 07% 0. 43% 0. 93% 0. 85% Page 1 Sheet1 71 72 73 74 75 76 POOJA BALU VETAL RAJESH KUMAR PARAG M LATHIYA ASHUTOSH SINGH ARJUN M MAYANK SINHA ST. MIRA'S COLLEGE FOR GIRLS SCHOOL OF COMMUNICATION & MANAGEMENT STUDIES (SCMS) LDRP BENGAL INSTITUTE OF BUSINESS STUDIES(BIBS) ST. JOSEPH'S INSTITUTE OF MANAGEMENT AMITY UNIVERSITY B. P.PODDAR INSTITUTE OF MANAGEME NT AND TECHNOLOGY (BPPIMT) CMS BUSINESS SCHOOL INDIRA INSTITUTE OF BUSINESS MANAGEMENT FUTURE BUSINESS SCHOOL GREAT LAKES INSTITUTE OF MGMT PUNE KOCHI GANDHINAGAR KOLKATA TRICHY GURGAON 1507374. 25 1507298. 7 1507284. 66 1506689. 12 1506507 1506000 632126. 6 811641 4166933. 75 137269. 44 1051965 334500 0. 49% 0. 49% 0. 78% 0. 65% 0. 49% 0. 52% 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 SANJANA SEN RAHUL NICHANAMETTLA PRATHAMESH DHARMIK MANDALE POOJA SETHI SANTHOSH KUMAR S SUDHANSHU KESHAV MOURYA ANURAG GUPTA RAM MILAN KANNUJIA KOLKATA BANGALORE MUMBAI KOLKATA CHENNAI MUMBAI JALANDHAR DELHI KOLKATA PUNE KOLHAPUR AHMEDABAD KOLKATA DELHI PUNE JALANDHAR TRICHY AHMEDABAD VISNAGAR JAIPUR 1505896. 5 1505846. 1505772 1505472. 76 1505448. 66 1505371 1505182. 5 1505154. 7 1504923. 27 1504847 1504450. 94 1504090. 2 1503889. 46 1502875 1502740. 5 1502332 1502277 1502240. 76 1501853. 5 1501507. 86 1501469. 41 1501321 1501252. 75 1501160 1501127. 4 1501077. 05 1500834. 35 1500709. 1 1500515 0 510517. 1 0 243199 16911647. 35 0 0 0 0 1478127. 6 0 16151721. 7 498939. 5 0 714160 450073. 2 0 17700875. 4 0 448070. 76 1047920. 95 0 51487. 28 418670 1032958. 65 0 0 415179. 6 0 0. 33% 0. 33% 0. 61% 0. 57% 0. 23% 0. 52% 1. 33% 0. 60% 0. 54% 0. 12% 0. 00% 0. 87% 0. 81% 0. 48% 0. 15% 0. 08% 0. 13% 1. 41% 0. 64% 0. 10% 1. 34% 0. 12% 0. 12% 0. 08% -0. 08% 0. 38% 0. 03% 0. 08% 0. 03%SHRI VISHVESARIYA IMS LOVELY PROFESSIONAL UNIVERSITY GAUTAM BUDDHA UNIVERSITY INTERNATIONAL INSTITUTE OF SUKANTA SAHA BUSINESS STUDIES (IIBS) SADHU VASVANI INSTITUTE OF BHUMIKA NIRMAL SONI MANAGEMENT (SVIMS) SANJAY GHODAWAT INSTITUTE SOURABH INANI (SEMINAR II) VARSHIT BIPINBHAI DOSHI NRIMB AMINUR RAHAMAN GAZI NSHM BUSINESS SCHOOL(NBS) ASIA PACIFIC INSTITUTE OF RENU YADAV MANAGEMENT NASIRUDDIN FAKRUDDIN DR. D. Y. PATIL INSTITUTE OF SHAIKH ENGINEERING & TECHNOLOGY APEEJAY INSTITUTE OF ANU THANGRIA MANAGEMENT TECHNICAL CAMPUS MAREDDY INDIAN INSTITIUT OF MARKANDEYU LU MANAGEMENT(IIM) INDIAN INSTITIUT OF SIDDHARTH M MANAGEMENT(IIM) NARESH DAHYABHAI VISNAGAR INSTITUTE OF PRAJAPATI MANAGEMENT MEGHA AGARWAL BANASTHALI VIDYAPITH CAMPUSJAY PRAKASH CHAUDHARY OXFORD COLLEGE OF MANAGEMENT BANGALORE LOKESH DURGESH GHOSAL ITM DOMBIVLI MUMBAI SRN ADARSH COLLEGE OF ASHISH KUMAR MISHRA BANGALORE MANAGEMENT ASHWINI DEVARAJAM SANKA MUMBAI VIVA COLLEGE OF MANAGEMENT INTERNATIONAL MANAGEMENT AMANDEEP SINGH MAINI DELHI INSTITUTE(IMI) RAJ KUMAR GOYAL INSTITUTE FOR ABHISHEK RAI DELHI TECHNOLOGY (RKGIT) VISHAL JALHOTRA DEHRADUN GRAPHIC ERAÂ   UNIVERSITY MONICA SATISH SHARMA ICL COMMERCE COLLEGE VASHI MUMBAI NANDALAL M SIVADAS AMRITA COLLEGE OF MANAGEMENT BANGALORE BABU BANARASI DAS NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY & MANAGEMENT VIDYALANKAR INSTITUTE OF SUSHMA VIJAY GHADGE MANAGEMENT LALIT SONI ST.KABIR INSTITUTE MANAGEMENT NITU SINHA MERI INSTITUTE MONICA ALLURI NSB KENGUA ASHUTOSH ICFAI BUSINESS SCHOO L(IBS) DILIP MADHUBHAI CENTRE FOR MANAGEMENT STUDIES PRAJAPATI (CMS) SUJITH S KURUP RAI BUSINESS SCHOOL INSTITUTE OF BUSINESS PIYUSH DILIP KHESE MANAGEMENT & RESEARCH (IBMR) TUSHAR GULATI ICFAI BUSINESS SCHOO L(IBS) JAYDEEP PRATAPRAI INDIAN EDUCATION SOCIETY RATHOD INSTITUTE OF MANAGEMENT(IESIMS) INTERNATIONAL SCHOOL OF AVIJIT SAHA BUSINESS JAGANATH SUBRAMANIAN HYDERABAD BUSINESS SCHOOL SOUMYA SUKHMAY NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF CHATTERJEE COOPERATIVE MANAGEMENT (NICM) KALPESH KAILASH SHARMA MDI PRIYANT RAMESHBHAI LADANI OXFORD COLLEGE OF MANAGEMENT YASH YOGESHBHAI SHAH K S BUSINESS SCHOOL 2 DR. GAUR HARI SINGHANIA INSTITUTE PUSHPINDER SINGH PURI OF MANAGEMENT & RESEARCH INDIAN INSTITUTE OF MANAGEMENT SASIKANTH BAPATLA (IIM) ABHISHEK MADASSERY FEDERAL INSTITUTE OF SCIENCE & ASHOK TECHNOLOGY(FISAT) RIZVI INSTITUTE OF MANAGEMENT KARAN KIRTI DOSHI STUDIES R. A.PODAR INSTITUTE OF AKSHIT BAJ MANAGEMENT ACHARYA'S BANGALORE BUSINESS SURI SAI SRIKANTH SCHOOL INDIAN INSTITUTE OF PLANNING AND VIREN PARMAR MANAGEMENT(IIPM) SREE NARAYAN GURUKULAM SHAHANAS PA COL LEGE OF ENGINEERING FABEESH MOHAMED IIPM, KOCHI G SANDEEP GANDHIKOTA BUSINESS SCHOOL DEEPAK HEDDA GARDEN CITY COLLEGE KOLHAPUR INSTITUTE OF VENUGOPAL LALIT DAVDA TECHNOLOGY INSTITUTE OF BUSINESS AND SAISMITA DALAI COMPUTER STUDIES(IBCS ) SOUMITRA KUMAR INDIAN INSTITUTE OF PLANNING & MANDAL MANAGEMENT(IIPM) DIPTI DINESH NADKARNI IEIBS AKADEMIA BLESSINA JEBARAJ JEPPIAR ENGINEER COLLEGE SYMBIOSIS INSTITUTE OF BUSINESS STUTI BANSAL MANAGEMENT (SIBM) INDIAN INSTITUTE OF PLANNING & P SUNIL KUMAR MANAGEMENT(IIPM) JAYAMUKHI INSTITUTE OF GOUTHAM BIJJALA TECHNOLOGICAL SCIENCES DEBASISH BAJ ITM BUSINESS SCHOOL ORIENTAL INSTITUTE OF ANIRUDH MAHESH SANGHI MANAGEMENT VIVEK AGARWALA LOVELY PROFESSIONAL UNIVERSITY VELS INSTITUTE OF BUSINESS DASARATHY GANESAN ADMINISTRATION GANESH R NIT DEEPMALA YADAV 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 LUCKNOW MUMBAI AHMEDABAD DELHI BANGAL ORE KOLKATA AHMEDABAD CHENNAI PUNE HYDERABAD MUMBAI KOLKATA HYDERABAD AHMEDABAD DELHI BANGALORE AHMEDABAD KANPUR KOZHIKODE KOCHI MUMBAI JAIPUR BANGALORE PUNE KOCHI KOCHI HYDERABAD BANGALORE KOLHAPUR BHUBANESHWAR BHUBANESHWAR MUMBAI CHENNAI PUNE HYDERABAD WARANGAL WARANGAL MUMBAI JALANDHAR CHENNAI TRICHY 1500416. 1500306. 63 1500152. 85 1500148 1500000 1500000 1500000 1500000 1500000 1500000 1500000 1500000 1500000 1500000 1500000 1500000 1500000 1500000 1500000 1500000 1500000 1500000 1500000 1500000 1500000 1500000 1500000 1500000 1500000 1500000 1500000 1500000 1500000 1500000 1500000 1500000 1500000 1500000 1500000 1500000 1500000 Page 2 0 4957494. 14 461163. 8 1164534 0. 04% 0. 75% 0. 01% 0. 59% 0. 00% 0. 00% 0. 00% 0. 00% 0. 00% 0. 00% 0. 00% 0. 00% 0. 00% 0. 00% 0. 00% 0. 00% 0. 00% 0. 00% 0. 00% 0. 00% 0. 00% 0. 00% 0. 00% 0. 00% 0. 00% 0. 00% 0. 00% 0. 00% 0. 00% 0. 00% 0. 00% 0. 00% 0. 00% 0. 00% 0. 00% 0. 00% 0. 00% 0. 00% 0. 00% 0. 00% 0. 00%Sheet1 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 PREEYAM HIMANSHU TOLIA GOURAV TYAGI INDRAJEET SARKAR MEVISH PANCHAL PIYUSH MANOJ MODHSARAF CHANDNI JITENDRABHAI ZAVERI ABHYUDAY SINGH CHAUHAN FAIZAN KHAN KARTHIK HARIHARAN PRADEEP V SATENDER SINGH RAWAT PRAMOD AGRAWAL HARSH RANJAN ANIRBAN TARUN HAZRA KUNWAR VIKRAM SINGH BHAVIK JAGDISHBHAI BHAVSAR RAHUL VIJAYAKUMAR PRATIK MAHENDRA MANANI BHAGYASHREE SURESH PATIL SAINATH NIVLAKAR VISHAL SINGH JOHNSON BANDI ANKIT ANAND SHUBHAM JAIN ANUBHAV SINGH PADALIYA DHAVAL DEEPCHAND RADHYASHYAM GUPTA AMRITA MAZUMDAR YOGESH HARSHADBHAI PATEL SUJIT P ANUTOSH KUMAR AJEET PRATAP KHANDE NIKET CHANDAK SATYAJIT MAHAPATRO MANJUNATH RA SHREY ARORA GAURAV KAMBLE JOYDEEP DEY PANKAJ RAMESH RAI SURAJ SANJAY TAMHANE RADHE NARAYANDAS RATHI PRANAY VIJETA MUKESHKUMAR GUPTA KISHANKUMAR CHAUDHARY RAJENDER AGGARWAL SAMBHAV GUPTA RA JIV TARASHANKAR MAURYA PATHIK ASHOK DOSHI SACHIN DADABHAU ARGADE NIKUNJKUMAR BIPINCHANDRA GOR ARVIND SINGH NABA KUMAR MEDHI AFSAR TANWEER VIVA COLLEGE OF ARTS,COMMERCE AND SCIENCE ITS GHAZIABAD INSTITUTE OF ENGINEERING & MANAGEMENT BHARTIVIDYAPEETH COLLEGE OF MANAGEMENT ALKESH DINESH MODI IMS MUMBAI GHAZIABAD KOLKATA MUMBAI MUMBAI 1500000 1500000 1500000 1500000 1500000 1500000 1500000 1500000 1500000 1500000 1500000 1500000 1499980. 58 1499898. 8 1499840. 31 1499298. 49 1499240 1498978. 6 1498975. 44 1498765. 1 1498463. 91 1498376. 77 1497879. 7 1497736 1497537. 85 1497026. 1 1496824. 5 1496650 1496525. 13 1496018. 95 1495073. 73 1493679. 6 1491854. 05 1490459 1489680 1487377. 61 1485605. 25 1484849 1483542. 5 1481977. 63 1480659. 65 1480337. 56 1480059. 8 1478627. 88 1478035. 91 1477020. 08 1476154. 24 1475551. 17 1474566. 66 1458569. 63 1455800 1450658. 24 1444595 0. 00% 0. 00% 0. 00% 0. 00% 0. 00% 0. 00% 0. 00% 0. 00% 0. 00% 0. 00% 0. 00% 0. 00% 0. 00% 0. 48% -0. 01% 0. 13% -0. 05% 1. 24% 0. 00% 0. 18% 0. 08% -0. 11% 0. 54% 0. 54% 0. 68% 0. 00% 0. 50% -0. 23% 0. 73% -0. 27% 0. 16% 0. 7% -0. 04% -0. 35% 0. 13% 0. 88% -0. 38% 0. 14% 0. 12% 0. 77% -2. 62% -1. 70% 0. 95% 0. 69% 0. 23% 2. 83% -0. 67% -4. 74% -0. 41% 1. 31% -2. 50% -3. 29% -3. 72% RAJKOT R K UNIVERSITY DHARMSINGH DESAI INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY & MANAGEMENT(DDIT) NADIAD NARSEEMONJI INSTITUTE OF MUMBAI MANAGEMENT STUDIES (NMIMS) INDIAN INSTITIUT OF INDORE MANAGEMENT(IIM ) VELLORE INSTITUTE OF CHENNAI MANAGEMENT (VIT) GLA UNIVERSITY II MATHURA GLA UNIVERSITY I MATHURA JAIPUR GYANVIHAR INSTITUTE DY PATIL INSTITUTE OF MANAGEMENT MUMBAI BELAPUR SWAMI VIVEKANAND INSTITUTE OF MUMBAI MANAGEMENT STUDIES CHIMANBHAI INSTITUTE OF AHMEDABAD MANAGEMENT CRESENT BUSINESS SCHOOL (B. S.ABDUR RAHMAN UNIVERSITY) CHENNAI ICFAI BUSINESS SCHOOL SANJAY GHODAWAT INSTITUTE ENTREPRENEURSHIP DEVELOPMENT INSTITUTE OF INDIA (EDI) JAIPURIA INSTITUTE OF MANAGEMENT NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY(NIT) SCHOOL OF MANAGEMENT, KIIT UNIVERSITY INTERNATIONAL SCHOOL OF INFOMATICS & MANAGEMENT (IIIM ) TRINITY INSTITUTE OF PROFESSIONAL STUDIES NEW DELHI INSTITUTE OF MANAGEMENT (NDIM) GAHLOT INSTITUTE HERITAGE GROUP OF INSTITUTIONS GANPAT UNIVERSITY XAVIER INSTITUTE OF MANAGEMENT BIFM SOCIETY FOR EDUCATION & RESEARCH LYYOD INSTITUTE OF MANAGEMENT INDIRA COLLEGE FACULTY OF MANAGEMENT STUDIES (FMS) MS RAMAIAH COLLEGE INSTITUTE OF RURAL MANAGEMENT(IRM) ADITYA COLLEGE NSHM BUSINESS SCHOOL(NBS) UNITED BUSINESS SCHOOL SIES COLLEGE OF MANAGEMENT, NERUL D Y PATIL GREATER NOIDA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY GNVS INSTITUTE OF MANAGEMENT S V INSTITUTE OF MANAGEMENT INDIAN INSTITUTE OF MANAGEMENT(IIM) LUCKNOW AMITY BUSINESS SCHOOL DR. G D POL FOUNDATION YMT COLLEGE OF MANAGEMENT FLAME BUSINESS SCHOOL MUMBAI KOLHAPUR AHMEDABAD JAIPUR WARANGALBHUBANESHWAR JAIPUR DELHI DELHI MUMBAI KOLKATA AHMEDABAD BHUBANESHWAR DELHI DELHI PUNE DELHI BANGALORE JAIPUR MUMBAI DURGAPUR AHMEDABAD MUMBAI PUNE DELHI MUMBAI KADI DELHI AHMEDABAD MUMBAI PUNE 14 0773. 02 0 469778. 52 5920537. 72 278734. 9 1516500 0 1806549. 85 603598. 3 3727765. 43 9780 0 1359144. 05 0 427764 0 4693020. 75 4546906. 55 293725 148376. 1 2361056. 9 0 0 6257722. 15 0 0 664855. 8 24198 15104297. 55 14073842. 49 6103274. 4 10377288. 23 14504753. 51 7697288. 85 1796680. 35 19766905. 12 1469829. 15 6301258. 4 0 1486542. 2 15548000 MODERN COLLEGE PUNE NARSEEMONJI INSTITUTE OF MANAGEMENT STUDIES HYDERABAD LOVELY PROFESSIONAL UNIVERSITY JALANDHAR INDIAN INSTITUTE OF FOREIGN TRADE KOLKATA – IIFT XISS- XAVIER INSTITUTE OF SOCIAL SCIENCE RANCHI SMT.HIRABEN NANAVATI INSTITUTE OF MANAGEMENT & RESEARCH FOR WOMEN AMRITA SCHOOL OF BUSINESS SANKLP BZ COLLEGE INDIAN INSTITIUT OF MANAGEMENT(IIM) JAGANNATH INSTITUTE OF MANAGEMENT STUDIES (JIMS) VIVA COLLEGE OF MANAGEMENT JAMNALAL BAJAJ INSTITUTE OF MANAGEMENT STUDIES RAJAGIRI SCHOOL OF MANAGEMENT ST FRANCIS INSTITUTE OF MANAGEMENT MODERN INSTITUTE OF BUSINESS MANAGEMENT JAIPUR ENGINEERING COLLEGE & RESEARCH CENTRE (JECRC) SYDENHAM INSTITUTE OF MANAGEMENT STUDIES 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 NEHA ANIL SONAWANE ASHIS KUMAR NAYAK ANKUR HANUMANDASJI LOYA RAMAKRISHNA REDDY PV ASHISH VATS NILESH KALOJI PATIL CHAITANYA GANDHI ASHISH M THOMAS SAVIO IGNATIUS PEREIRA PUNE COIMBATORE PUNE BANGALORE DELHI MUMBAI MUMBAI KOCHI MUMBAI 1443019. 28 1438403. 49 1421968. 3 1403592. 6 1387933. 23 1382846. 1 1347535. 19 1315017. 23 1232887. 18 7221815. 06 6706791. 4 7983803. 6 15200000 17918166. 91 15326224 18887715. 9 14959391. 89 18177223. 5 -3. 67% -3. 27% -1. 88% -3. 44% -9. 27% -11. 30% -13. 48% -13. 75% -12. 7% Disqualified as Turnover exceeded 2 crore on 13-Mar2013 Disqualified as Turnover exceeded 2 crore on 13-Mar2013 Disqualified as Turnover exceeded 2 crore on 13-Mar2013 Disqualified as Turnover exceeded 2 crore on 14-Mar2013 Disqualified as Turnover exceeded 2 crore on 13-Mar2013 Disqualified as Turnover exceeded 2 crore on 13-Mar2013 Disqualified as Turnover exceeded 2 crore on 14-Mar2013 Disqualified NEHAL MEHUL DOSHI PUNE 2158899. 67 681523032. 99 30. 27% Disqualified INDU RAJ SHARMA JAIPUR 1746172. 62 136730223. 38 3. 01% Disqualified PARIN JAYESH JAIN MUMBAI 1689359. 21 29836586. 33 5. 38% Disqualified MRINAL AGRAWAL ICFAI BUSINESS SCHOOL GURGAON 1652256. 13 1019418. 73 9. 76% Disqualified DIPEN GIRISHBHAI DESAI SJPIM AHMEDABAD 1638720. 53 38609002. 49 5. 92% Disqualified KRATIKA KAPOOR BANASTHALI VIDYAPITH CAMPUS BANASTHALI 1602585. 74 174113219. 86 4. 03% Disqualified AKASH SINGHAL IILM DELHI DELHI 1595289. 76 Page 3 20201491. 1 0. 81% Sheet1 LAL BAHADUR SHASTRI INSTITUTE OF MANAGEMENT DELHI Disqualified as Turnover exceeded 2 crore on 14-Mar2013 Disqualified as Turnover exceeded 2 crore on 13-Mar2013 Disqualified as Turnover exceeded 2 crore on 13-Mar2013 Disqualified as Turnover exceeded 2 crore on 13-Mar2013 Disqualified as Turnover exceeded 2 crore on 13-Mar2013 Disqualified as Turnover exceeded 2 rore on 13-Mar2013 Disqualified as Turnover exceeded 2 crore on 14-Mar20 13 Disqualified as Turnover exceeded 2 crore on 13-Mar2013 Disqualified as Turnover exceeded 2 crore on 13-Mar2013 Disqualified as Turnover exceeded 2 crore on 13-Mar2013 Disqualified as Turnover exceeded 2 crore on 13-Mar2013 Disqualified SURBHI BEGWANI 1579115. 33 20629835. 15 2. 46% Disqualified HIMANSHU SHEKHAR BIT MESRA KOLKATA 1548771. 65 85329123. 21 -3. 35% Disqualified SANDEEP KUMAR INDIAN INSTITUTE OF FOREIGN TRADE DELHI (IIFT) 1513222. 8 44599450. 3 8. 38% Disqualified RAHUL SHYAMKUMAR JAIN ICFAI BUSINESS SCHOOL PUNE 1508190. 05 61504026. 95 -6. 39% Disqualified ARUN K IIT – MADRAS ENGG. DEPTCHENNAI 1501859. 94 57156690. 7 -2. 77% Disqualified DEEPANKAR KSHITIZ EMPI BUSINESS SCHOOL NALANDA INSTITUTE OF ADVANCED STUDIES DELHI 1497135. 03 69303860. 97 -2. 90% Disqualified SHEIKH HOSSAIN KOLKATA 1477135. 35 24163113. 25 -1. 52% Disqualified KUNTAL DEVESH DAVE SAL INSTITUTE OF MANAGEMENT AHMEDABAD 1447490 29854052. 5 -6. 76% Disqualified GOBIN RANA SONA COLLEGE OF MANA GMENT INSTITUTE OF MANAGEMENT & TECHNOLOGY(IMT) SALEM 1444626. 85 37832292. 25 -1. 46% Disqualified TUSHAR SHARMA MANMOHAN SINGH SIKARWAR GHAZIABAD 1380792. 05 40439282. 21 -3. 78% Disqualified ICFAI BUSINESS SCHOO L(IBS) AHMEDABAD 1064207. 96 111815542. 74 -21. 15% Page 4

The Use of Humor in Richard III by Shakespeare

There is no doubt that Shakespeare was the author of great pieces of literature during an interesting time period. Given the circumstances, he was indeed mastering his craft during a very tumultuous juncture in British history. When one reads Richard III, they don’t necessarily have to know a great deal about the War of Roses to understand that there is some serious strife going on. However, if the reader takes some time to understand this fascinating string of events, the story of Richard and his fall becomes much more interesting. In all of his brilliance, Shakespeare manages to toy with the idea of humor in this very morose play. As a matter of fact, he does this in many, if not all of his tragedies. However, few may match the juxtaposition of humor with the macabre in Richard III. After a reading of this play, one may ask, â€Å"how does Shakespeare use humor in this play? † The answer to that would be: in a few different ways. However, no matter which was he uses humor; the end result will be a perfectly balanced dialogue that is witty and snappy. First, the reader is introduced to the play’s protagonist, Richard. His opening lines are incredibly captivating, but they come to an abrupt halt when his brother Clarence approaches. Already, the audience is let in on Richards â€Å"dirty little secret† that tells us he wants to become king, and will kill anyone who stands in his way. Unfortunately for Clarence, he is in the way. However, the reader would be keen to notice that Richard is a manipulative satirist. He constantly uses humor and ridicule to expose the stupidity or even naivety of others around him. In the very first scene, Clarence is being led up to the tower by guards, which is all part of Richard’s master plan. When Richard asks about the situation, he is sympathetic and angry. At this point, the reader gains some insight to what kind of person Richard is, and may even see a slight hint of humor in the situation. Indirectly, the audience is almost spoken to in an aside type of manner. Readers of the play know full well what is going on, and the gullible nature of the unsuspecting murdered-to-be is funny. Again, in Act I, scene ii, the reader sees Richard interact with Anne. It is pointed out that he has killed her husband, and as the story unfolds, the reader can tell that she is not too happy about this. However, an argument ensues, and Richard manages to woo Anne. The exchange is full of colorful language and snappy wit, the kind Shakespeare is so good at. However, the best part of this exchange of words occurs at the end of the scene, when Richard states, â€Å"Was ever woman in this humor wooed? /Was ever woman in this manner won? † (ll 234-235) Obviously, the word humor in this sense is not how modern readers would understand it. However, the way the scene unfolded, and the way that Richard is pleased with himself is humorous, even if it’s the, â€Å"ha-ha, you think you’re hot stuff† kind of humor. In the following scene, members of the nobility are arguing over status. While some readers may find the exchanges between all of them to be funny because they are acting like children, the true humor lies in the false poise of Queen Margaret in her asides. While some of the members argue, she puts her two cents in, and then steps forward. The dialogue gets snappy and heated, but takes a sharp break when this part of the exchange comes: â€Å"Margaret. /Richard/Ha! /I call thee not! /I cry thee mercy, then, for I did think/ That thou hadst called me all those bitter names. /Why, so did I, but looked for no reply. (ll 236-241) The reader can imagine this exchange of dialogue taking place on stage, careening back and forth, until a little humor breaks it. However, the dialogue picks up again, and the bitterness continues. After she exits, they all talk to each other, pretty much asking, â€Å"what the heck was that all about? The next scene also has some prime examples of humor in this play. Here, two murderers are sent to kill Clarence. The text is so rich in indirectly describing the demeanor of these two, and the reader undoubtedly chuckles when reading the dialogue between the two of them. Primarily, the reader sees this in lines 110-115: â€Å"I’ll go back to the duke of Gloucester and tell him so. / Please, just wait a minute. I’m hoping my holy mood will pass. / It usually only lasts about twenty seconds. / How are you feeling now? / Actually, I’m still feeling some pangs of conscience. Even in modern times, the idea of a conscience coming and going instead of being unwavering is funny. Even funnier is the thief being aware of this, and saying, â€Å"hang on, it’ll pass†, as if his holy conscience were a case of bad gas or something like that. Further on, the two murderers talk about conscience, and how nobody would listen to it even if it flew out of a wallet. Of course, no Shakespeare play would be complete without the use of puns. Shakespeare uses this type of humor as a witty way to keep the dialogue fresh and flowing. The reader gets a taste of these funny little bits as early as the first act and first scene, when Brakenbury starts, â€Å"With this, my lord, myself have naught to do. / Naught to do with Mistress Shore? I tell thee, fellow, / He that doth naught with her, excepting one, / Were best he do it secretly, alone. / (ll 97-100) The reader sees Richard use a play on the word ‘naught’. Brakenbury seems to use it for a common meaning, â€Å"nothing†. However, Richard being as dirty minded and witty as he is, uses the word as ‘copulate’ or ‘naughty’. So, he implies that there should only be one guy having sex with Mrs. Shore, and that everyone ought to keep their sexual business to themselves. Shakespeare is using humor for the sake of it right here, but he also allows the reader to see the quick-thinking side of Richard. This really solidifies the image of Richard as an evil, two-faced person. Again, Shakespeare uses puns in the scene with Anne as well: O, cursed be the hand that made these holes; / Cursed the heart that had the heart to do it; / Cursed the blood that let this blood from hence. (ll 13-15) And yet again, the reader sees a subtle use of the pun in act I, scene I when Richard says, â€Å" Well, your imprisonment shall not be long, / I will deliver you, or else lie for you. / (ll 114-115) Here, Shakespeare lets the audience in on the little joke that only Richard and those who are reading know. The word lie to Clarence means, â€Å"Go to prison† or â€Å"stay in prison†. However, the reader knows for certain that Richard means lie as in ‘deceive’. And deceive he will, as this is his whole purpose in the play. Throughout the play, readers are reminded that this is a gruesome story about a man and his tragic flaws. Perhaps this man Richard even fell from grace, but he’d have to have grace to begin with. Shakespeare does a good job of infusing humor in the most fitting ways by characterizing Richard as a satirist and excellently deceiving linguist. Also, Shakespeare uses humor in sharp, brisk dialogue between characters to demonstrate ideas such as lack of conscience and close-mindedness. Again, while there may be humor in other Shakespeare tragedies, none may be able to balance out the storyline as well as it was done in Richard III.